The European Union’s decision to use the proceeds generated from frozen Russian sovereign assets—estimated at hundreds of billions of euros—has sparked widespread political, economic, and legal debate at the international level. This move not only affects relations between Brussels and Moscow but also opens a new chapter in how sovereign assets are treated during times of conflict. In this context, a central question arises: How is Russia likely to respond to this European decision?
First: The Legal and Political Background of the European Decision
Since the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, the European Union, in coordination with the United States and its allies, has frozen Russian sovereign assets, most of which belong to the Russian Central Bank. More recently, European states have moved toward using the returns generated by these assets, rather than the assets themselves, to finance military and economic support for Ukraine.
The European Union argues that this measure is based on political and moral justifications, while Moscow considers it a dangerous precedent and a violation of international law and the principle of sovereign asset immunity.
Second: The Legal Response – The Most Likely Path
Russia’s initial response is expected to be primarily legal, through several avenues, including:
Filing lawsuits before international or European courts against financial institutions managing Russian assets.Using Russian courts to seize European corporate and banking assets inside Russia under the principle of “reciprocity.”
Pressuring international legal forums to challenge the legitimacy of the European decision and its impact on the global financial system.
Although this path may be lengthy and complex, it allows Moscow to present itself as a defender of international law rather than a purely retaliatory actor.
Third: The Economic Response – Targeting European Interests
Economically, Russia has several tools at its disposal, most notably:
Seizing or nationalizing European assets operating within Russian territory, particularly in the energy, industrial, and financial sectors.Redirecting economic partnerships toward Asia—especially China and India—to reduce reliance on the European financial system.
Expanding the use of local and alternative currencies instead of the euro and the dollar in trade settlements, as part of a broader “financial decoupling” strategy.
These measures are not merely retaliatory but are also intended to reshape Russia’s position in the global economy over the medium and long term.
Fourth: The Political and Diplomatic Response
Politically, Moscow is likely to escalate its rhetoric against the European Union by:
Accusing Europe of politicizing the global financial system and undermining trust in Western institutions.Using the European decision to strengthen alliances with countries concerned about the precedent of seizing sovereign assets.
Promoting a media narrative linking the decision to a decline in Europe’s status as a safe financial hub.
This approach aims to politically isolate the European Union, particularly in the eyes of countries in the Global South that are closely monitoring these developments.
Fifth: Could Russia Resort to a Military or Security Response?
Despite the heated rhetoric, it is unlikely that Russia would pursue a direct or military response solely because of this decision. Moscow understands that any further military escalation would be used to justify additional sanctions. Therefore, Russia’s response is expected to remain within legal, economic, and political frameworks, without crossing new red lines.
Sixth: Implications for the Global Financial System
The European Union’s decision, along with Russia’s potential responses, carries consequences that extend beyond both parties, including:
A decline in confidence in the principle of sovereign asset immunity.Accelerated efforts by some countries to diversify their reserves away from Europe and the broader West.
Intensified global debate over reforming the international financial system and reducing dependence on Western currencies.
Conclusion
In summary, Russia’s response is expected to be calculated and incremental, combining legal, economic, and diplomatic measures without escalating into a direct confrontation. Over the long term, the European Union’s decision may represent a turning point in the rules governing sovereign assets—one that could ultimately reshape the architecture of the global financial system.
The most critical question remains: will Europe secure short-term gains, or is it opening the door to deeper transformations that could eventually undermine its own financial stability?
2025 Biggest Transformations: A Deep Analysis of Global Economic and Geopolitical Change